Jump To Navigation

Case Results

DELIBERATE  INDIFFERENCE TO MEDICAL NEEDS/EXCESSIVE FORCE

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington filed a civil rights lawsuit on behalf of an inmate in the county jail who was beaten and deprived of mental health services during his incarceration from October 2007 through February 2008. The lawsuit alleged excessive use of force by a jail guard and separate claims for deliberate indifference to the inmate's serious medical needs. The inmate suffered from schizophrenia and was mentally disabled. .

Back to Top

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE TO RISK OF SUICIDE

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington along with an Oklahoma law firm are  involved in a lawsuit for the heirs of an inmate who committed  suicide. The young man had been arrested and was undergoing  detoxification from methadone in the County Jail. The detoxification  was performed by a foreign corporation under contract with the County  Jail. The corporation violated their own standards regarding  detoxification. The health care provider also gave psychotropic  medications that cause patient to become suicidal. They then failed to  monitor the patient. The corporation violated the drug warning from the  manufacturer of one of the drugs prescribed  regarding the risk of  suicide.

Back to Top

EXCESSIVE FORCE BY POLICE OFFICERS DURING ARREST

Larry Wall obtained a jury verdict for a motorcyclist beaten by  Wichita Police Department (WPD) officers while handcuffed. The trial  was in Wichita  Federal  District Court. The jury found the police  officers were guilty of using excessive force. The police officers all  testified that the victim had attacked them and his head injuries  occurred when they fell during the handcuffing procedure.  The  officers also claimed they entered the Chapter 9 Lounge on a "routine  investigation." The law suit established that the "biker" was arrested  without probable cause and was hit on the head and legs with police  batons after he was handcuffed,  The client suffered from partial  paralysis of his hands due to the handcuffs being applied too tight and  for too long of a time. Mr. Wall used the WPD, photographs of the  head injuries in cross examination of the officers to prove the  officer's version was not true. The verdict was paid pursuant to a  confidentiality agreement. All three of the officers involved were still  working for the department after the case was settled.

Back to Top

VACCINE INJURY FOLLOWING INFLUENZA(FLU) SHOT

Tina Huntington represented a client who suffered a severe reaction  to a routine influenza (flu) shot. Within hours of receiving the shot  in his left upper, the client's arm and hand began to swell. By day  two, he developed bilateral shoulder pain. The patient's joint pain and  swelling continued to progress. He was eventually diagnosed with  inflammatory (rheumatoid) arthritis. The patient had no history of this  type of arthritis prior to the flu shot. The treatment of choice for  the patient's condition was methotrexate and prednisone which carry  significant risk of lymphoma. The patient was later diagnosed with  Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, which ultimately took his life. A claim was made  on behalf of the patient and his wife through the Vaccine Injury  Compensation Program (VICP), which resulted in a confidential  settlement.,  The VICP allows people injured by vaccines and  immunizations to receive compensation, without having to prove who was  at fault for the injury. Claims are brought to the Federal Court of  Claims, by attorneys admitted to practice in that special court. If  you believe you or a loved one have been injured by a vaccine or  immunization please give us a call.

Back to Top

CUSTOMER INJURED BY DANGEROUSLY LOOSE SHELVING

Larry Wall represented a client who was injured while shopping in a  Wichita, Kansas  department store. Overstocking of merchandise,  inappropriate merchandising and the  use of glass shelves in the infant  clothing department and failures in inspection caused   a shelf  to  fall. It struck our client's foot, causing tarsal tunnel injury.  The shelves were not secured by fasteners and the person in charge of  inspection was laid off prior to the incident. The policy of the  department store encouraged under-reporting of defects that could  injure patrons. The lawsuit was reported in The Wichita Eagle. The  article quoted Judge Robert Bell citing the lack of attention to patron  safety. A Sedgwick County jury awarded actual damages of $300,000.00, and the court awarded punitive damages in the amount of $958,531.47  for a total verdict of 1.3 million.

Back to Top

PATRON INJURED BY HOTEL'S FAILURE TO CLEAR ICE AND SNOW (black ice)

Larry Wall represented a client who was hurt at a hotel in downtown  Wichita, Kansas. As the client exited from the Exhibition Hall she had  to walk on an uncovered sidewalk area to access the parking garage. As  the client was walking toward the parking garage on a path that had  been partially cleared of snow she encountered an area of black ice., Black ice is a thin coating of glazed ice that is virtually  transparent. As a result, she slipped on the ice and suffered life  altering injuries. She had to undergo surgery and missed work as head  nurse for a local hospital.  A lawsuit was filed in February of 2002.  The lawsuit alleged that the management of the hotel was careless  because it knew of the icy area and lied in the reports that the area  had been completely cleared. When confronted with photos and evidence  from a former long time employee that sand was never spread and  everyone knew the area always accumulated black ice the case was settled  for a substantial and confidential amount.

Back to Top

TEACHER SEVERELY INJURED IN A FALL CAUSED BY CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO LIGHT WALKWAY

Larry Wall represented a teacher who tripped on an uneven wooden  walkway as she left a school event at night. The area was unlighted.  The walkway had been constructed by the contractor who was building a  new addition to the school. The fall caused her knee to dislocate and it  required surgical repair the next day.  Her medical bills were in  excess of  $7,000.00 and she was unable to work for six months. She  was required to use a walker for the rest of her life. The insurance  company denied all liability and attempted to blame the victim. The  principal had previously agreed the area needed lighting and said the  contractor was supposed to do it that day. The lighting never was put  in place and as a result the client was severely injured and disabled  for life. When faced with the statements of the EMT personnel, the  concerned citizen and the principal, the insurer for the contractor  reversed its phony claim that it was the pedestrian's fault and settled  for a substantial amount.

Back to Top

ELDERLY CUSTOMER KNOCKED TO THE FLOOR BY DOG IN A BUSINESS SUFFERS A FRACTURED HIP

Tina Huntington represented an elderly client who was violently  knocked to the floor by a dog running loose in a business. The client  entered the building and  she was violently and abruptly thrown into  the wall and knocked to the floor resulting in a left hip and pelvis  non-displaced fracture. An operator of a place of business which is open  to the public owes a duty to the business visitor to use reasonable  care, under all of the circumstances to keep the business safe. This  duty applies to all areas in the business used by the business visitor.  The owner also has a duty to warn business visitors of any dangerous  condition which they know about or should know about if they had  exercised reasonable care in tending to the business. The claim was  resolved for a substantial amount without the necessity of suit.

Back to Top

TENANTS SUFFER SEVERE LIFE ALTERING INJURIES DUE TO CARBON MONOXIDE POISONING FROM AN INADEQUATELY MAINTAINED FURNACE LEAK

Larry Wall and Tina Huntington represented a client who suffered  severe injuries as a result of extended exposure to carbon monoxide  that leaked from an inadequately maintained furnace. After five days of missing work, a co-worker called to request someone check on his  welfare. The client and his girlfriend were found lying paralyzed on  the floor of their apartment. As a result of the exposure, our client  suffered a heart attack, an acute kidney injury, brain swelling, severe  polyneuropathy and decubitus ulcers. He also suffered significant brain  injury. Unfortunately, the client is now disabled from his injuries.  Landlords are charged with the duty to inspect and maintain furnaces to  ensure it is in good and safe working order. Failure to do so is  negligence. This case is in active litigation

Back to Top

PATIENT CONTRACTS SEVERE ENDOMETRIOSIS DUE TO PHYSICIAN'S,  FAILURE TO CONDUCT A PELVIC EXAM

Larry Wall represented a young girl who developed endometriosis due  to the failure of her family physician to conduct a pelvic exam at the  time of her first menstrual cycle. Endometriosis is a painful and  debilitating condition for which there is no cure. As a result of  carelessness, she will experience periods of extreme pain for the rest  of her life.  The exact cause of endometriosis is unknown. The  retrograde menstruation theory (trans-tubal migration theory) suggests  that during menstruation some of the menstrual tissue backs up through  the fallopian tubes, implants in the abdomen, and grows. However, in  this case the failure of the doctor to conduct a pelvic exam prevented  him from discovering that she had an intact hymen. Because of that  condition all of her menstruation fluid backed up through the fallopian  tubes. The case settled for a confidential amount without the need for  a trial.

Back to Top

YOUNG GIRL LEFT PARTIALLY PARALYZED AND INCONTINENT FOLLOWING SPINAL SURGERY, HOSPITAL ALTERED RECORD OF TRUE EVENTS

Larry Wall represented a young girl who was left partially paralyzed  and incontinent because of medical negligence that occurred during a  spinal surgery. The hospital was required  to monitor the patient  during the surgery by using a  somata sensory evoked potential system.  SSEP monitoring produces a strip that depicts changes in wave forms of  the spinal nerves caused by trauma during surgery. If done correctly,  the SSEP strip will warn the surgeon that spinal nerves are being cut  before serious damage occurs.  A surgeon can never cut a nerve if they  are paying close attention to their scalpel and know what they are  cutting before they cut it. This case was first tried and lost by  another malpractice lawyer. He requested,  Larry Wall's assistance to  investigate and to try a fraud case if altered records could be  discovered. Together they discovered that the SSEP records were  phony.  The attorney for the hospital claimed "I believe this case  boils down to a misfiling-that we have made a mountain out of a  molehill."  Larry Wall filed a Motion for Punitive Damages, which was  granted by Judge Paul Clark. Judge Clark said in his ruling that the  evidence showed that the hospital "acted with the arrogance of a  despot," and "that what all this evidence shows is a pride that blocks  prudence and wisdom." The case settled after Larry Wall deposed the  SSEP technician and shortly after Judge Clark made his findings. Larry  Wall received the Consumer Advocate Award from the Kansas Trial Lawyers  Association in December 2002 for his work in fighting fraud in  hospitals records.

Back to Top

PATIENT INJURED BY EXCESSIVE PRESCRIBING OF THE DRUG  STADOL ®

Larry Wall represented a woman addicted by her doctor to the pain  killer Stadol ®. Mr. Wall filed suit in Topeka, Kansas, against the  doctor and the pharmacist that provided the drug in excessive amounts.  The case settled for $515,000.00.  The names of the defendants are  subject to a confidentiality agreement. The evidence showed the  pharmacist and the doctor had an unethical financial relationship. The  evidence also disclosed that the pharmacist wrote a note on a check he  received stating, "Ain't fibromyalgia beautiful !" The doctor was  disciplined by the Kansas Board of Healing Arts as a result of this case  and lost his medical license.

Back to Top

PATIENT SUFFERS TRAGIC DEATH DUE TO A PHYSICIAN'S FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE AND TREAT CERVICAL CANCER

Larry Wall obtained a substantial settlement against two Wichita  doctors for their failure to diagnose and timely treat cervical cancer  in a 39 year old married woman. As a result of the negligence the woman  was deprived of 42 years of life and suffered a horrible death. She was  a Registered Nurse. An economist was retained and prepared a report  that detailed the lost income and household services at $1.3 million.  Thus, the case settled very close to the actual losses and without the  risk of a trial. Cervical cancer should never occur in the United  States. Please see the website below for steps you can take to protect  yourself.

Back to Top

SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL CANCER CAUSES PATIENT TO SUFFER EXTENSIVE SURGERY AND RADIATION THERAPY

Larry Wall represented a woman who was told she had cervical cancer.   The client had received annual pap exams. The defendants misread the  PAP tests and reported the exams as normal. Larry Wall obtained the  original slides and had them reread by an expert cytologist. The slides  were actually all grossly abnormal. The delay in diagnosis caused her  to suffer extensive surgery and radiation therapy. Settlement  Confidential. If you have a question about a PAP test see the website  for information.

Back to Top

PATIENT SUFFERS UNTIMELY DEATH DUE TO PHYSICIAN'S FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE AND TREAT UNSTABLE ANGINA, TREATMENT NOTES WERE ALTERED

Larry Wall filed suit against a doctor in Colony, Ks. for his  failure to diagnose and treat unstable angina. Unstable angina is new  unexplained chest pain or shortness of breath that is an emergency. It  requires immediate hospitalization. Unfortunately for the client he saw  his family practice doctor on a Friday and his doctor and the cardiologist he consulted decided to wait until Monday to treat the  condition. On Monday his wife took him to Wichita, Kansas to the  cardiologists office for an early morning appointment. He was seen by a  medical assistant and was given two doses of nitroglycerin which  caused his blood pressure to drop dangerously low. The cardiologist was  not even present when this occurred and when he finally arrived he  didn't know how to intubate the patient. As a result the patient  suffered from lack of oxygen and ultimately died. The family practice  doctor was  also forced to admit that he had created two different  sets of records for the single visit. Larry Wall retained an economist  to testify that this wrongful death caused the heirs to lose several  million dollars plus the advice and comfort of their husband, father  and grandfather. The case settled on the eve of trial.

Back to Top

INFANT SUFFERS SEVERE BRAIN INJURY SHORTLY AFTER BIRTH DUE TO NEGLIGENT ADMINISTERING OF DRUG BY NEONATAL NURSING STAFF

Larry Wall represented the parents of a twin baby boy who sustained  severe brain damage due to nursing negligence. The hospital was  understaffed. There were not enough nurses for the number of newborns at  the time of this tragedy. The hospital was more interested in profits  than patient safety. The baby had low blood pressure at the time of  delivery. The baby's doctor ordered normal saline to be given  intravenously over time to stabilize the baby's blood pressure. The  nurse was in a hurry and was confused about how to read the label on  the saline solution and administered a solution which as 50 times  stronger than it should have been, causing the new-born's brain to  swell to the point of tissue destruction. The hospital was also  negligent for storing the two types of saline side-by-side, despite  warnings issued by the manufacturer stating that the two types should  no be stored together because of the risk of medication error. Mr. Wall  sued the hospital on behalf of the baby and secured a Life Care Plan  in excess of $20 million. The case settled after Larry Wall deposed all  of the nurses and administrators and established the hospital was  understaffed. The medication error was indefensible. Mr. Wall remains  close to the family. Sadly he had to attend this precious child's  funeral.

Back to Top

PATIENT SUFFERS FATAL STROKE WHEN PHYSICIAN FAILS TO DIAGNOSE HER BRAIN BLEED, ALERTED RECORDS SENT TO HOSPITAL WITH PATIENT

Larry Wall filed suit against a doctor in Arkansas City, Kansas on  behalf of a married mother of two for his failure to recognize that  sudden onset of a severe headache and alarmingly high blood pressure are  warning signs of a hemorrhagic stroke. The woman presented to her  doctor without an appointment with complaints of a severe headache that  developed suddenly without warning or any known reason. The nurse  recorded her blood pressure at 210/100. If heeded, this warning sign  gave the doctor ample time to treat and save the patient.  Unfortunately, the doctor prescribed a water pill and sent her home  where she was found later that day unresponsive. She was life watched  to Wichita, Kansas. The doctor sent a "doctored" set of records with  her in the ambulance. At he and his nurse's deposition they both  testified that she never complained of a headache. Larry Wall disclosed  at the end of their depositions that he had the statements of two  patients that had been in the waiting room that same day and had seen  the victim crying with pain due to the severity of her headache. He  also had 3 witnesses that had seen her at a coffee shop a few hours  before and that she was complaining of the "worst head ache of my  life." Confronted with the realization that the altered records had been  discovered and that the lie would not hide the malpractice the  defendant quickly settled for $975,000.00. The doctor soon left the  practice of medicine. He went to work for a doctor owned malpractice  insurance company.

Back to Top

PATIENT'S GENITALIA BURNED BY CARELESS SURGEON FOLLOWING SURGERY

Larry Wall brought suit against a urologist for burning a female  patient following surgery because he was in too big of a hurry to wait  for safe irrigating water following the surgery. The patient was burned  on the vulva and the perineum. The water is used to clean blood from  the surgical site so the surgeon can be certain that the wound is not  bleeding. The water needs to be warm since cold water would tend to  cause small bleeds to temporarily coagulate. Unfortunately the water  must be warmed but the equipment at the hospital had been  malfunctioning for some weeks and produced bottles of water that were  boiling hot. The nurse warned the doctor that the water was too hot but  he ignored her and took the water and poured it over the sensitive  areas. The area immediately blistered. The surgeon then left the area  and ordered the patient be placed on narcotics for the pain.  Unfortunately, the area did not heal and a law suit had to be filed.  The client did not want to go to trial because of the embarrassing  nature of the wounds. The defendant doctor did not want to go to trial  faced with the realization that Larry Wall had interviewed all of the  nurses in the operating room and they all were willing to testify to  the facts.

Back to Top

NEWBORN SUFFERS A SEVERE IV INFILTRATION INJURY TO HIS FOOT AS A RESULT OF NURSING NEGLIGENCE

Larry Wall represented a new born who was injured in a Wichita,  Kansas hospital nursery because the nurses were overworked and  understaffed. The nurses were also ignorant of the standard of care for  IV infusions. As a result of the negligence, the IV was placed in the  wrong location, the needle was the wrong size and the site was not  monitored regularly as required by standard IV policies. A substantial  settlement occurred and a life annuity was created that will pay for  future medical bills and surgeries.

Back to Top

CANCER PATIENT SUFFERS AN IV INFILTRATION INJURY TO HIS  CHEST WHEN NURSE FAILS TO ENSURE AND MONITOR NEEDLE STABILITY AND  PLACEMENT

Tina Huntington represented a cancer patient who was injured in a  Wichita, Kansas  medical facility because the nurse failed to adhere  to basic safety principles. The nurse ignored the standard of care for  IV fusion which requires frequent monitoring and the discontinuation of  IV therapy when presented with any signs or symptoms the drug has  escaped outside the vein into the tissue. As a result of the nurses  negligence, the patient suffered a significant wound to his chest that  caused him unnecessary pain and suffering while he was already trying  battling cancer. A substantial settlement was secured for the family.

Back to Top

PATIENT SEVERELY INJURED WHEN HOSPITAL STAFF AND PHYSICIAN FAIL TO TIMELY DIAGNOSIS AND TREAT STROKE SYMPTOMS

Larry Wall tried a malpractice lawsuit on behalf of a woman in  Salina, Kansas. The lawsuit involved an ER doctor who was an active  alcoholic at the time the client's presented to the ER. The lawsuit  also included four other doctors and the hospital. The patient had been  experiencing TIA symptoms for about 30 days prior to her first visit to  the ER. She was sent home without treatment for a stroke in progress.  She returned to the ER a few days later with new stroke symptoms. The  lawsuit also involved her primary care doctors for their failure to  treat the TIA symptoms prior to the stroke and their failure to  administer a clot buster drug called T.P.A., or to transfer to a stroke  center. The jury returned a verdict against 3 doctors for $  474,400.00.  Larry Wall obtained a life care plan that projected an  economic loss of $5,586, 673.00. Prior to the jury verdict the hospital  involved settled for a confidential amount.

Back to Top

YOUNG BOY SUFFERS CATASTROPHIC INJURIES WHEN AN EMERGENCY  ROOM PHYSICIAN AND HOSPITAL STAFF FAIL TO DIAGNOSE AND TREAT ROCKY  MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER

A boy was taken  by his Mother to a Wichita emergency room and to  doctors for treatment of a fever and a rash. All the doctors failed to  diagnose his illness as Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Their  carelessness  resulted in the loss of use of the boys' legs, the loss  of four fingers, and the loss of his ability to hear and speak.   Three attorneys took the case and settled it without authority from the  Mother. She then hired Larry Wall and he filed pleadings to discharge  the attorneys and to prevent enforcement of the alleged settlement. He  also secured an out of state malpractice firm to try the lawsuit.  The  jury returned a verdict of 9.8 million dollars. Unfortunately, Kansas  has a cap on damages for pain and suffering. Miller  v. Johnson Because of the cap, the verdict was reduced to $4,252, 832.98. The  Kansas Supreme Court is currently reviewing the appeal in Miller v. Johnson that challenges the constitutionality of the caps.

Back to Top

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS PATIENT SUFFERS A COMPLETE BOWEL  OBSTRUCTION REQUIRING SURGERY AND OSTOMY DUE TO PHYSICIAN'S FAILURE TO  APPROPRIATELY TREAT AND MONITOR HER CONDITION

Larry Wall represented a mother of two children who suffered from  progressive Multiple Sclerosis.  Her MS had been successfully treated  with a drug known as ACTH.  ACTH is a natural hormone that decreases  the severity of the symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis. The client was  admitted to Wichita Specialty Hospital. Upon arrival, the nurses told  the patient that a doctor on call had prescribed Solumedrol, ® a  synthetic hormone instead of ACTH.The doctor falsely told her that the  natural hormone was no longer manufactured and was not available. The  doctor also told the patient that she had to accept the synthetic  hormone in order to remain a patient in the hospital. She accepted and  suffered horrible reactions and a blocked bowel. The doctor dismissed  her from the hospital with out seeing her and she suffered a complete  bowel obstruction which required surgery and an ostomy. Larry Wall  obtained expert medical testimony that the natural hormone was  available. The entire tragedy could have been avoided if the doctor had  told the truth. The case settled for a confidential amount prior to the  hearing on a motion for punitive damages.

Back to Top

PARALYZED PATIENT SUFFERS SEVERE BED SORES ON COCCYX AS A  RESULT OF THE HOSPITAL NURSING STAFF'S FAILURE TO PROPERLY EVALUATE AND  IMPLEMENT SAFE GUARDS TO PREVENT SKIN BREAK DOWN

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington represented a woman who fell in her  home in Eureka, Kansas. As a result of the fall she was paralyzed. She  was transported to a hospital in Wichita, Kansas for treatment. The  hospital failed to properly use the Braden Score to evaluate the risk  of developing bed sores. The hospital failed to place the patient on a  bed designed to reduce the development of bed sores. The hospital  failed to frequently reposition and turn the patient. As a result a  large bed sore developed on her coccyx. The failure of the hospital  administrators and the nursing staff was well known to Larry Wall and  Tina Huntington. Through experience we possess & knowledge of   Wichita hospital practices regarding bed sores. Tina Huntington and  Larry Wall prepared a draft of a Motion for Punitive Damages and  submitted that and the draft of the Petition to the hospital's  malpractice law firm and suggested mediation. The case was settled for a  large confidential amount that included funds to purchase a proper  hospital bed and to provide for care for the wound until it was healed,  in addition to substantial funds for the patient's pain and suffering.  In 2008, Medicare and Medicaid listed bed sores as a Never Event.

Back to Top

ELDERLY PATIENT HOSPITALIZED FOLLOWING HIP FRACTURE SUFFERS  SIGNIFICANT BED SORES ON COCCYX AS A RESULT OF NURSING STAFF'S FAILURE  TO PROPERLY EVALUATING AND IMPLEMENT SAFE GUARDS TO PREVENT SKIN BREAK  DOWN

Larry Wall filed a lawsuit against Riverside Hospital on behalf of a  patient who was seen in the emergency room at a local hospital. She  was admitted due to her inability to care for herself.  She had  fallen and broken her hip. On the admission history form, her skin was  described as, "warm and dry without rash, lesion, or pigmentation  changes." Days later,  a nursing operative record documented Kathryn  as having a, "large area of skin breakdown on coccyx, Stage II,  involving left and right buttocks..." Kathryn remained in the hospital  for care and treatment of the decubitus ulcer for months. Following her  release from the hospital, she would require care and treatment for  the decubitus ulcer for an additional six months. Bed sores like this  should never develop when a patient is in a hospital or a nursing home.  A significant settlement was obtained due to the wanton nature of the  nursing negligence and the extensive time it took to heal the sores.

Back to Top

ELDERLY PATIENT SUFFERS AN UNEXPLAINED BURN ON BUTTOCKS DURING BACK SURGERY

Tina Huntington represented an elderly female who was injured in a  Wichita, Kansas hospital surgical unit. The client underwent scheduled  back surgery and following the procedure, was found to have suffered an  severe burn to her buttocks area. The defense contended they had no  idea how the injury could have occurred during surgery and denied the  injury was even a burn. A fair and reasonable settlement was obtained  prior to trial.

Back to Top

HEART PATIENT SUFFERS MULTIPLE DECUBITUS ULCERS DUE TO HOSPITAL  NURSING STAFF'S FAILURE TO PROPERLY EVALUATING AND IMPLEMENT SAFE  GUARDS TO PREVENT SKIN BREAK DOWN FAILURE TO PREVENT AND TREAT BED  SORES

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington filed a lawsuit against a Wichita  hospital on behalf of an elderly patient who was hospitalized in its  facility in July of 2003 due to persistent nausea and vomiting. He  would ultimately require heart surgery. In August, about a month into  his admission, the hospital staff documented the patient had skin  breakdown on his buttocks.  No measurements or photographs were  taken.  After Over forty-six hours later, the patient was evaluated by  the "wound care nurse" concerning the area of skin breakdown on his  buttocks. The patient was noted as being very weak and on dialysis for  long periods of time. The patient's skin breakdown had continued to  deteriorate.  The patient's skin breakdown continued to deteriorate  and was later described as a large area stage II-III pressure ulcer  over the sacrum/coccyx region, with very irregular borders over the  left buttock ,with tissue erosion and moist black eschar in the center  of the wound, in addition to erythema and induration noted over the  area with the greatest in duration over the coccyx. Post debridement the  wound was measured as 5 x 3 cm x 1.8 cm deep. Two additional ulcers  were noted on the right buttock. They were documented as two smaller  ulcers that had bridged together, with erythema and in duration noted  over the coccyx region. The right buttock wound was documented as a  stage II ulceration with red/pink tissue base and scant serous  drainage.,  In September of 2003, the patient was transferred to Our  Lady of Lourdes for inpatient rehabilitation therapy secondary to his  continued need for assistance with mobility and self-care. Photographs  were taken at that time identifying the skin breakdown as Stage IV. The  patient would continue to suffer from wounds until his death. The  National Quality Forum has included Bed Sores on its list of 28  inexcusable outcomes in a health care setting. The outcomes are referred  to as  "Never Events."  A confidential settlement was reached prior  to trial.

Back to Top

WRONGFUL DEATH OF PATIENT DUE TO CLINIC STAFF'S FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE AND TREAT CLASSIC SYMPTOMS OF UNSTABLE ANGINA

Tina Huntington & Larry Wall filed suit against a doctor and a  family practice clinic in Great Bend, Kansas for failure to diagnose  and treat unstable angina. The patient presented to the clinic with  complaints of a seven-day history of increasing shortness of breath,  anxiety, and an inability to breathe while lying down. The patient was  diagnosed with anxiety. She was given a handout on interventions. A  complete physical examination was not obtained. No blood tests were  ordered, nor was her heart and cardiovascular system evaluated. The  patient returned to the clinic with continued complaints of shortness of  breath. An echocardiogram was conducted. The echocardiogram results   were abnormal. It revealed evidence consistent with an anterioseptal  infarct (heart attack). The patient was only told she would be  contacted regarding the significance of the echocardiogram findings. No  blood tests were ordered. A treadmill exam was recommended. The  patient was again diagnosed with anxiety. She was instructed on how to  slow her breathing and given a prescription for Lorazepam. An employee  of the clinic called the patient and advised her that no other  echocardiograms were found for comparison, despite the fact a prior  normal echocardiogram was contained in the clinic record. The patient  returned to the clinic for a third time with continued shortness of  breath and swelling. She was noted as pale and pasty with shallow  breathing and  an eighty-nine percent oxygen saturation. The clinic  note indicated the patient as having had a cardiac work-up and chest  x-ray that were all normal. A complete physical examination was not  obtained. The patient's heart and cardiovascular system were not  evaluated. Sleep studies, ABG's, and PFT's were recommended. Two days  later, the patient's family took her to the emergency room because of  increasing respiratory distress. She was diagnosed with congestive heart  failure and possible acute coronary syndrome. The patient was  stabilized and transferred to St. Francis hospital. Electrocardiogram  studies were consistent with a recent antecedent anterior wall  infarction. The patient's ejection fraction was estimated to be thirty  percent. A chest x-ray revealed she had cardiomegaly with bilateral  interstitial alveolar edema. The patient went into acute rental failure  and aggressive diuresis was instituted. The patient's heart failure  worsened, she developed cardiogenic shock, in addition to the acute  renal and respiratory failure. The patient died that evening. During the  critical visits to the clinic, the patient was seen by an advanced  registered nurse practioner (ARNP) who by Kansas law is required to be  under the supervision of an attending physician. However, there was no  attending physician working at the clinic during the critical time  frame for this patient. The case settled for a confidential sum prior  to trial.

Back to Top

PATIENT SUFFERS SIGNIFICANT BOWEL DEATH DUE TO HER  SURGEON'S FAILURE TO PROMPTLY TREAT A BOWEL LEAK FOLLOWING COLON  RESECTION SURGERY

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington filed suit against a Great Bend  surgeon for failure to promptly treat a significant bowel leak  following a colon resection surgery. On or about post-op day 3, the  patient began to show signs of abdomen distention and a clear lack of  bowel sounds. A CT scan of her abdomen, reveals free fluid and air in  the abdomen and also notes changes at the sight of the anastomosis  (where the colon was reconnected) that could represent a partial bowel  obstruction. The patient's abdomen remains distended over the ensuing  days.,  She continues to be remain uncomfortable and requires morphine  and various other medications to treat her pain. The patient spikes a  fever and her oxygen saturation level drops as low as 87%. The surgeon  then orders abdominal x-rays which again indicate partial obstruction.  No surgical intervention is taken that day. The following day, the  surgeon orders a barium enema study which again notes a partial  obstruction and material is clearly seen leaking from the site of the  anastomosis.  Another day goes by and the patient's morphine dosage is  increased and despite the fever-reducing effects of the pain  medication, she spiked fevers. She is not sleeping well, and her attempt  to walk that day ended with dangling her legs over the bedside.  Much  more alarming, though, is that the patient becomes confused and  forgetful on this day, and she is not answering questions  appropriately. She is now leaking stool both internally and externally  when she gets out of bed. On post-op day twelve, the surgeon finally  takes the patient back to surgery and finds her bowel is necrotic (dead)  and she is suffering from severe sepsis.  The patient's abdomen is  so infected and swollen that closure is not possible. The patient is  flown to Wichita with her abdomen still open where she ultimately  undergoes multiple abdominal surgeries. Months following the initial  surgery, the colostomy was finally taken down and her abdomen was  closed.  The patient continued to deal with abdominal hernias as a  result of the extensive scar tissue and adhesions that remain  throughout her abdomen. The case was settled for a confidential amount  prior to trial.

Back to Top

WRONGFUL DEATH OF PATIENT WHO PRESENTED TO EMERGENCY ROOM  COMPLAINING OF CHEST PAIN, SENT HOME WITH DIAGNOSIS OF HYPERVENTILATION

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington filed suit on behalf of a  Hutchinson family against a physician and emergency room for failure to  appropriately assess and treat unstable angina resulting in the  patient's death. The patient (who had heart stints placed just 6 months  prior) presented to the emergency room with complaints of chest  discomfort. An EKG taken at the emergency room revealed a "possible  lateral infarct." He was diagnosed with upper respiratory infection and  hyperventilation and sent home with instructions that advised, "You may  feel as though you are going die. This is not going to happen." and  "breathing slowly into a paper bag will help solve the problem." The  patient was dismissed to go home. He and his family left the emergency  room and made the less than 10 minute drive to their home. The patient  was unable to make it into his house and collapsed on the ledge in  front of his home. EMS arrived and administered oxygen but the patient  seized and a code blue was called. The patient was taken back to the  emergency room, but could not be stabilized and was pronounced dead  within an hour. The case was resolved for a confidential sum prior to  trial.

Back to Top

STEPHEN SCHNEIDER, D.O.'S PAIN CLINIC PRACTICES RESULTS IN OVER 176 PATIENT OVERDOSES, BODILY INJURIES AND 68 PATIENT DEATHS

Assistant United States Attorney Tanya Treadway dedicated more than  five years to the criminal prosecution of a Haysville, Kansas,  physician and his wife on 34 criminal counts including illegal  distribution of controlled substances, conspiracy to commit health care  fraud, health care fraud resulting in death, and money laundering.   The practices of the doctor and his wife lead to over 176 patient drug  overdoses, bodily injuries, and 68 deaths. On the eve of trial in  February, 2009, a federal judge significantly reduced the case,  limiting it to four patients.  Ms. Treadway  prevailed on appeal and  successfully prosecuted the case, obtaining Guilty verdicts for both  defendants from a jury after an eight week trial.  Her commitment and  dedication obtained a result that will help to ensure the safety of  patients and consumers across Kansas and the United States.

In addition to the federal prosecution numerous wrongful death  actions were brought by the heirs of the victims of Dr. Schneider.  Larry Wall and Tina Huntington had the opportunity to assist several of  those families. On December 30, 2012, Larry Wall was honored to  receive the Kansas Association of Justice "Distinguished Practice  Award" for his tireless efforts on behalf of families impacted by the  reckless practices of Dr. Schneider.

Larry Wall represented the heirs of Kandace B. who died as a result  of an accidental drug over dose on 11-14-2003. She was the mother of  two children. She was a patient at the Schneider Clinic from 07-10-03  until 11-12-03. She died from an accidental drug over dose two days  after her last appointment. Larry Wall received a report from  Dr.   Steven Richeimer of the University of Southern California. As a result  of the report of Dr. Richeimer the case was settled with the provision  that the amount of the settlement remain confidential.

Larry Wall represented the husband of Patricia G. who died as a  result of an accidental drug over dose. The medications had been  prescribed at the Schneider Clinic in Haysville, Kansas. Patricia had  been a patient at the clinic from February 1, 2003 through June 20,  2005. Larry Wall obtained an expert report from Dr. Graves Owen an  expert who had volunteered to help Dr. Schneider before this lady's  death occurred. As a result of the discovery of Dr. Owens and the  submission of his report the case settled for a confidential amount.

Larry Wall accepted the case of a patient that did not die from a  drug overdose. Justin B. was a chronic pain patient CPP treated with  chronic opioid therapy COT at the Schneider Clinic from October 19,2001  until September 12, 2005.  As a result he became addicted to opioids.  The addiction was no his fault. His addiction was caused by the  Clinic's greed and the carelessness of Dr. Schneider. He was later  treated for the addiction caused by the over prescribing and was able  to live without pain and without narcotics.  He was referred to the, detox specialist by Larry Wall. The case was resolved after Larry Wall  provided the reports of the  addiction and detox specialist. The expert  detoxified Justin with Suboxone ®. Wall Huntington Law Firm will help you or a  loved one even if the addiction is ongoing. Treatments for narcotic  addictions are available in Wichita, Kansas for nominal fees.

Larry Wall represented the Estate and heirs of Jeff H. Jeff was 45  years old and was married and was the Father of  two teen age  daughters at the time he died.  He was treated at the Schneider Clinic  five times and on all visits he was provided narcotics.  Larry Wall  retained Dr. James Hay of the Seacoast Pain Institute,  Dr. Graves T.  Owen of the Texas Pain Rehabilitation Institute.  His death was caused  by the treatment he received at the Schneider Clinic. He was last  treated on 12-08-2004. He died from the effects of the drugs he  received from the Schneider Clinic three days after he was found  unresponsive at work the evening of 12-27-04.  The case settled after a  Motion for Punitive Damages was filed.

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington represented the heirs of Lucy S. in  a lawsuit for her wrongful death. She was a patient of the Schneider  Clinic from 8-29-03 til 8-23-07.  She died from a accidental drug  overdose on 8-29-07 just six days  after her last visit to the clinic.  The lawsuit claimed that Dr. Stephen Schneider and his Schneider  Clinic LLC. were both responsible for the actions of Connie White PA  and Dr. Lawrence Simon.  Both White and Simon lost their licenses to  practice the healing arts.  Lucy was happily married with five loving  children at the time of her death. The case settled after one day of  court ordered mediation for a confidential amount.

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington represented the heirs of Tina R.  who was a chronic pain patient (CPP) of Dr. Stephen Schneider at his  Schneider Clinic in Haysville, Kansas from 6-10-2004 through  11-23-2005. She was treated with chronic,  opioid therapy (COT). She  also suffered from a severe mental illness. Her  son and daughter  were so concerned that she was suicidal that they both accompanied her  on her last visit to the clinic. They expressed concern to Dr.  Schneider however he assured them she was not suicidal without  performing an tests or a psychological examination. She committed  suicide four days after her last visit to the clinic. The drugs  prescribed to her by Dr. Schneider on the last visit were known to  increase the risk of suicide.

Back to Top

WHEELCHAIR BOUND ELDERLY PATIENT WITH CHRONIC DEMENTIA  ALLOWED TO WANDER OUTSIDE THE NURSING HOME UNATTENDED ON A WINTRY DAY  SUFFERS A FRACTURED HIP AND ULTIMATELY DIES DUE TO A NEGLIGENT CARE  PLAN AND SUPERVISION

Tina Huntington represented the family of an elderly gentleman who  suffered from Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) and chronic  dementia. Due to the complexity of his nursing needs he was placed in a  nursing facility to ensure he would receive around the clock care. The  nursing home claimed to "specialize" in the care of helpless  individuals who were chronically infirm and professed to have a  Alzheimer's Special Care Unit. From the time the patient was admitted  and throughout his residency at nursing home he was vulnerable and  susceptible to serious injury as a consequence of wandering/elopement.  On one cold December day, the resident was once again unattended and  wheeled himself out the front doors of the facility into the parking  lot. He fell out of his chair next to a car and laid there for an  unknown amount of time before he was finally spotted by staff. The  resident suffered a broken hip and died a short time later. The case  was resolved for a confidential sum prior to trial.

Back to Top

ELDERLY PATIENT WITH COGNITIVE ISSUES SUFFERS A FALL OUT OF  HER WHEEL CHAIR WHILE UNATTENDED RESULTING IN A FACIAL HEMATOMA AND  DIFFUSE INJURIES TO HER FACE AND LEFT SHOULDER

Tina Huntington represented the family of an elderly woman who had a  very complex health status including: chronic renal failure on  maintenance hemodiaylisis, history of congestive heart failure,  depression, gastroesophageal reflux  disease, insulin dependent  diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, peripheral vascular disease, anemia,  left shoulder swelling, and hypocalcaemia. Additionally, she was  confined to a wheelchair due to having a right above the knee  amputation. Because her husband  was unable able to care for his wife,  he agreed with her physician's recommendation that her care required  professional attention and selected a nursing home to meet her  increasing needs. From the time she was admitted and throughout her  residency at the nursing home she was vulnerable and susceptible to  serious injury as a consequence of falls. Her susceptibility to falls  and subsequent injury was a function of: (a) periodic intervals of  confusion and cognitive impairment; (b) gait, station, and balance  abnormalities due to previous right leg above the knee amputation and  left shoulder pain and swelling; (c) prescribed use of Lortab and  Klonopin; (d) osteoarthritis; and (e) use of wheelchairs as a walking  assistance device. The foregoing risk profile was clearly manageable  through application of fundamental nursing principles. In November of  2003, the resident suffered a massive hematoma to her forehead, and  diffuse bruising to her face and left shoulder as a result of falling  out of her wheelchair while unattended. The case was resolved for a  confidential amount prior to trial.

Back to Top

ELDERLY WOMAN RIDING A BIKE STRUCK BY UTILITY WORKER

Larry Wall represented an elderly but very fit woman who was struck  by the mirror of a pick-up truck as she rode on the highway south of   Winfield  Kansas for her daily exercise. The woman was knocked  unconscious. She suffered permanent hearing and balance problems. There  were no witnesses and so proving the case was difficult. A witness  said he had seen a utility truck drive by earlier and that the truck  would pass by at the same time each day. An investigator located the  truck and photographed the broken mirror on the passenger side. As a  result the driver was located and the case settled for $180,000.00.

Back to Top

PEDESTRIANS STRUCK WHILE CROSSING HIGHWAY AT NIGHT

Larry Wall obtained a verdict in Federal Court in Wichita, Kansas  for Manual and Eva Garza. They were crossing the highway at night. They  were two blocks from a lighted intersection when they were struck by a  motorist that was speeding. At trial, they admitted they were in the  country illegally and had worked as migrant workers for over 30 years  and had never paid any income taxes. Larry Wall presented the jury with  evidence that they had raised 5 children and sent them all to college  and three had graduated at the time of the trial. One child was in  medical school. The jury was outraged at the defendants appeal to racial  prejudice. The defendant's accident reconstrutionist claimed that  because they were wearing dark clothes and had dark skin that made it  difficult for the defendant to see the couple. The jury returned a  verdict finding the driver 100 % at fault and awarded $184,000.00 for  their injuries.

Back to Top

PEDESTRIAN STRUCK WHILE CROSSING ROADWAY AT NIGHT

Larry Wall settled a case for a minor child who was hit in a cross  walk. On January 4, 2005, a  young boy approached a crosswalk signal  on North Ridge Road in Wichita, Kansas.  He pushed the button and  waited for the light to turn red.  He entered the cross walk with a  green light when he was struck by a speeding driver. The driver was on  her way to a Super Bowl Party.  He received significant scaring, loss  of teeth and developed a Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome. Larry Wall  found an eye witness and secured a psychologist, a plastic surgeon and  dentist to provide expert reports on the injuries and future medical  and dental bills. Zachary's therapist, opined that Zachary's symptoms  of nightmares, unpleasant thoughts, hyper vigilance, lack of interest  in usual activities and social isolation,  were a result of the trauma  he experienced from being hit in a cross walk.Past medical bills of  $22,071.48 were paid by his parents health insurance policy. Future  medical bills were estimated to be  $24,600.00. Larry Wall obtained a  release from the parents health care insurer and settled the case for a  large up front cash payment PLUS an annuity to be paid over Zachary's  life time. Larry Wall recovered enough to pay all future medical and  dental bills plus enough money for four years of  college tuition and  room and board.

Back to Top

DRIVER INJURED BY OVERLOADED TRACTOR TRAILER THAT RAN A RED LIGHT

Larry Wall represented a young college student in a lawsuit filed  against a truck driver that ran a red light and seriously injured the  student.  The law suit also named two companies. The truck was driving  at too high a speed under the conditions. The situation was  made  worse  by the bad brakes on the tractor and trailer which was  overloaded with gravel. The lawsuit sought compensation from all  negligent parties. The lawsuit was settled without a trial and without  formal mediation. This procedure resulted in significant savings to the  client. The settlement was for $704,625.00. The settlement also  allowed the client to collect substantial moneys from his Personal  Injury Protection (PIP) benefits without deduction from the proceeds  paid by insurer of Kropf Trucking.

Back to Top

BIG RIG-MINOR INJURIES-FAST SETTLEMENT

Larry Wall represented a client hurt by the tractor of an 18 wheeler  when the driver failed to yield the right of way. This client was  slightly injured when the 18 wheeler failed to yield the right of  way.  The injuries were not permanent and the client wanted to settle  quickly and move on with his life. This was accomplished quickly by the  use of a computer generated settlement system.

Back to Top

DELIVERY TRUCK REAR ENDS CAR CAUSING WHIPLASH INJURY

Larry Wall represented a client struck in the rear by a delivery  truck when she stopped for traffic. The driver of the delivery truck  said she stopped suddenly and blamed her for the fact that she was rear  ended. A check of the Kansas Drivers license for the delivery truck  driver revealed his license had been suspended. The owner of the  business that employed him was well aware of his bad driving record.  The damage to the client's vehicle was minor according to the insurance  adjustor, The initial offer of $10,000.00 was rejected. Larry Wall  fought the MIST defense. MIST is an acronym for (minor impact soft  tissue) and is used by insurance adjustors to cheat injured auto  accident victims of the true value of their claim. Larry Wall used a  DVD produced by the Spine Research Institute of San Diego   www.srisd.com to establish that the clients body position and direction  of impact did cause a permanent injury to the ligaments and spine. The  treating Doctor of Osteopathic provided a report and as a result the  case settled for policy limits without the necessity of a lawsuit.

Back to Top

DRIVER INJURED IN A SIDE IMPACT COLLISION SUFFERS SIGNIFICANT NECK AND TAIL-BONE INJURY

Tina Huntington represented a young man who was passing through the  intersection of Waco & Kinkaid when his vehicle was violently  struck on the drivers side by another vehicle who failed to yield right  of way. As a result the collision, the client suffered persistent neck  and tailbone pain. MRI's revealed a slight loss of intervertebral disc  height and bulging at C3-4, in addition to a bulging at C5-6. The  claim was resolved without the necessity of suit for a substantial sum.

Back to Top

PREGNANT DRIVER INJURED IN A FAILURE TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY / INTERSECTION COLLISION

Tina Huntington represented a pregnant young woman who was traveling  northbound on Southeast Boulevard in Wichita, Kansas approaching the  intersection of Harry and Southeast Boulevard. As she entered the  intersection on a green light, a pick-up traveling southbound on  Southeast Boulevard (K-15) toward her suddenly and inexplicably  attempted to make a left hand turn onto Harry Street.  This negligent  maneuver placed him directly in the path of my client. She tried to  avoid the collision but was unable to stop in time. My client, five  months pregnant and suffering from abdominal pain, as well as neck and  low back pain, was transported to the emergency by EMS where she was  evaluated and released. Although she was treated for continued back  pain and headaches, treatment options were limited due to her  pregnancy.  Fortunately, she delivered a healthy baby,and was  ultimately released from care. The claim was resolved without the  necessity of suit.

Back to Top

DRIVER INJURED DURING REAR END COLLISION LOSES JOB DUE TO INABILITY TO PERFORM DUTIES

Tina Huntington represented a young man who was traveling  northbound. Another driver also northbound, was not paying attention to  traffic, and slammed into the rear of client's vehicle.  The force of  the impact caused the back of client's vehicle to lift into the air  before coming back down to the ground. An eyewitness, said the client's  vehicle was hit so hard that it looked like it was going to flip over.  MRI of the client's cervical spine, revealed straightening and even  reversal of the normal lordotic curvature. Not surprising, a disc bulge  was found at C6-7.  During the course of his treatment, the client  was placed on short-term disability and eventually was terminated from  his job because he could not perform the required duties under his  restrictions.  The case was resolved for a substantial confidential  amount prior to trial.

Back to Top

DRIVER SUFFERS A SEVERE EYE INJURY WHEN HIS SUN-VISOR STRIKES HIS EYE DURING A REAR END COLLISION

Tina Huntington represented a middle aged gentleman who was rear  ended while stopped at a red light by an inattentive driver traveling  in excess of 30 miles per hour. The client suffered a corneal abrasion  & hemorrhage, as well as a cervical/thoracic strain. The defendant  turned out to be uninsured. A claim was made under the uninsured  portion of our client's policy. A reasonable resolution was reached  without the necessity of filing a lawsuit.

Back to Top

DRIVER AND PASSENGER SEVERELY INJURED IN HEAD ON COLLISION CAUSED BY A DRUNK DRIVER WHO CROSSED THE CENTER LINE

Larry Wall represented Bruce and Kathy M. who were injured in a head  on collision on US-160 near Medicine Lodge, Kansas. The driver was  intoxicated. He had just left a bar and drove another person's car head  on into their vehicle which was stopped at a red light. He was so  drunk he picked the wrong car when he left the bar. Thus, he was  driving a car without permission so that's car's insurance company  denied coverage. Since he was driving without permission his own  company also denied coverage. Larry Wall was able to recover by using  the underinsured coverage that was available to his clients. Both  clients were severely injured and required medical treatment. They were  transported via ambulance to the hospital and after surgery and  physical rehabilitation in the Pratt Regional Medical Center both were  able to return to work. Because a punitive damage motion was filed and  won by Larry Wall the driver of the vehicle had to contribute  personally to the settlement. The driver is still making monthly  payments pursuant to a promissory note and will do so for years.

Back to Top

DRIVER INJURED IN A REAR END COLLISION CAUSED BY A DRUNK DRIVER DRIVING AT NIGHT WITH NO HEADLIGHTS

Larry Wall represented a client who was rear ended at night by a  young man who was intoxicated and was driving so recklessly that  witnesses called 911 before the wreck. He had just left a bar and was  driving at a high rate of speed with his light off. He was driving with  permission Mustang Mach I ®  provided to him by his Grandfather.  His  Grandfather was an insurance company defense attorney. His Grandfather  claimed he had given the car to an unknown friend so he would not be  responsible for a negligent entrustment claim.Larry Wall filed suit  against the Grandson and the Grandfather. A punitive damage motion was  filed and won. The insurance company paid a substantial sum plus the  driver signed a promissory note and is still making payments to the  client.

Back to Top

WIFE AND MOTHER OF TWO KILLED WHEN A SPEEDING TRASH TRUCK FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT OF WAY CRASHING INTO HER DRIVER'S DOOR

Larry Wall represented the husband and children of Pamela C. who was  killed as she crossed the intersection of Broadacres and 6th Street in  Hutchinson, Kansas. She was driving a GMC van and was en route to her  home. She was killed when a speeding heavy duty trash truck crashed  into her door. Larry Wall retained an expert in accident  reconstruction. The driver of the speeding trash truck lied to the  police investigators and claimed that Pamela C. ran the stop sign. The  markings on the highway and the resting place of the vehicles after  impact were analyzed by the expert and a computer recreation  demonstrated that the trash truck driver's version was not factually  possible. It was discovered through surveillance of the driver that he  routinely sped through the intersection after the crash. Armed with  surveillance and an expert report the insurance company settled for a  confidential amount. The two children and the widower were able to use  the lump sum cash and lifetime annuity to rebuild their lives.

Back to Top

DRIVER INJURED IN REAR END COLLISION, DEFENSE ARGUED SHE HAD A PRE-EXISTING MEDICAL CONDITION

Larry Wall represented a young lady that had been involved in a no  injury accident three weeks before and who had also had three prior  surgeries. The client was rear ended so the question of fault was  clearly in our favor. However, the insurance company contended that the  prior accident was the real cause of the client's symptoms and that  because she had a "bad back" before she was always going to have a bad  back. The case was complicated by the fact that the client had a prior  criminal record. Larry Wall obtained statements form all the prior  surgeons that the "bad back" argument was not accurate. In fact, one of  the surgeons advised that her back was actually stronger than most  people her age. The insurance adjustor offered to settle for the policy  limits when confronted with the surgeon's opinion.

Back to Top

DRIVER AND PASSENGER INJURED WHEN A CAR CUT THROUGH A PARKING LOT TO AVOID A RED LIGHT

Larry Wall represented both the passenger and driver of a van that  was struck in the side by a driver of a car that cut through a parking  lot to avoid a red light. It is sometimes difficult to represent both  the driver and the passenger in a case. There are rules that concern  these situations. They are ethical rules and they deal with conflicts  of interest.  Make sure that you have a law firm that understands and  follows all conflict of interest rules. In this case the passenger had a  history of medical seizures and was severely injured. The driver was  slightly injured. The passenger and the driver signed a waiver of  conflict agreement and Larry Wall represented them both and achieved a  settlement for all damages and injuries. The driver and his passenger  remained friends.

Back to Top

DRIVER SUFFERS NECK INJURY WHILE WAITING FOR TRAFFIC TO  CLEAR TO MAKE A SAFE LEFT HAND TURN AND IS REAR ENDED BY ANOTHER  VEHICLE

Tina Huntington represented a middle aged gentleman who was rear  ended while stopped in traffic with left turn signal on preparing to  turn into a restaurant parking lot. The client suffered injury to his  neck and back that led to severe headaches and numbness and tingling in  his hands.  He would eventually be diagnosed with cervicalgia with  radiculopathy. The defendant initially attempted to claim my client did  not have any break lights on. The carrier ultimately paid policy  limits.

Back to Top

PASSENGER SEVERELY INJURED WHEN DRIVER FAILED TO YIELD TO STOP SIGN

Tina Huntington represented a young mother who was the front seat  passenger in a car driven by a co-worker on a lunch break. As the  co-worker attempted to cross U.S. Highway 50, she was broadsided by a  westbound vehicle. The car was catapulted into the field adjacent to  the highway. Our client was pinned in the wreckage and had to be  extricated from the car with Jaws of Life. She sustained significant  internal trauma and massive life threatening injuries. The client was  rushed to the emergency trauma center with significant blood loss. Once  stabilized, she received intervention and treatment for four fractures  to her pelvis, four broken ribs, a punctured lung, internal bleeding  and removal of her spleen. Upon release from the hospital, she was  transferred to a rehab hospital where she underwent rehabilitation to  learn to walk again. The claim was resolved for policy limits. An  additional claim was made by outside counsel for the client for  worker's compensation benefits. She was ultimately awarded benefits  when it was found she was in the course of her employment as a  traveling nurse.

Back to Top

DRIVER WHO HAD RECENTLY UNDERGONE NECK SURGERY RE-INJURED  WHEN A VEHICLE NEGLIGENTLY BACKED OUT OF A PARKING STALL CAUSING A  COLLISION

Tina Huntington represented a young lady who was traveling in the  parking lot of the Country Mart when she was struck by another driver  attempting to back her vehicle out of a parking stall. The other driver  stepped on the accelerator instead of the brake, rapidly backing out  of the stall and colliding with the rear drivers side of my client's  vehicle. Upon impact, the client felt a "pop" followed by neck pain and  numbness of the left side of her face, neck, left shoulder, arm and  leg.  A CT scan revealed displacement of her anterior cervical plating  system and screws from a prior surgical repair. She stabilized and  underwent surgery for removal of the displaced plate and insertion of a  new cervical plate at C5, C6 and C7.  The claim was resolved for  policy limits in addition to a waiver for reimbursement for personal  injury benefits (PIP) paid under the client's personal policy.

Back to Top

BACK SEAT PASSENGER INJURED IN REAR END COLLISION AT STOP LIGHT

Tina Huntington represented a young woman who was the restrained  back seat passenger in a vehicle driven by her Mother-in-law. The  Mother-in-law's vehicle was stopped at an intersection of in Great  Bend, Kansas. A second driver was also traveling directly behind. The  defendant was busy talking to her passenger and did not realize the  traffic in front of her had stopped. Her vehicle slammed into the rear  of the Mother-in-law's vehicle causing property damage and considerable  injury to our client. She began to experience daily headaches was  thought to have suffered a cervical strain. She would spend the next 18  months receiving chiropractic and physical therapy. The case was  resolved prior to filing suit.

Back to Top

POLICE OFFICER STRUCK BY VEHICLE DURING A TRAFFIC STOP, DRUNK DRIVER WHO WAS TEXTING

Tina Huntington & Larry Wall represented a police officer who  was outside of his vehicle while assisting another police officer with a  traffic stop, when he was knocked to the hood of his patrol car and  then to the ground when his patrol car was struck by a vehicle passing  the scene. The driver of the vehicle admitted he was texting on his  cell phone at the time of the incident. Lab results would later reveal  he was also under the influence of alcohol. The officer suffered a left  tibial fracture requiring open reduction and internal fixation. The  claim was resolved for policy limits.

Back to Top

WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIM BROUGHT ON BEHALF OF CHILDREN OF A PASSENGER KILLED IN A SUBURBAN / TRAIN COLLISION AT A PRIVATE CROSSING

Tina Huntington was co-counsel on a lawsuit brought against BNSF  Railway Company and the driver of a suburban as a result of a  truck-train collision in Cedar Point, KS.  Both the driver and  passenger of the suburban were killed upon impact. A claim was brought  on behalf of the four minor children of the passenger of the suburban.  The collision occurred at a private crossing with bucks signs erected  by B.N.S.F. Railway Company. The case was resolved to the mutual  satisfaction of the parties through mediation.

Back to Top

WRONGFUL DEATH OF A PATIENT WHO COMPLAINED OF STROKE SYMPTOMS, SENT HOME WITH DIAGNOSIS OF CARPEL TUNNEL

Larry Wall & Tina Huntington represented the family of a woman who suffered medical malpractice at the hands of a Wichita Ks doctor who failed to follow the standard of care. During her initial visit the patient explained to the doctor that she was feeling dizzy, had numbness and tingling in her hands and feet, and that she had blurred vision and other symptoms. Our client asked her doctor if she was having signs of a stroke, the doctor said no. Instead of testing and treating the patient he diagnosed her with carpal tunnel syndrome, a far less serious condition. The day after her last appointment with the doctor she suffered a stroke and subsequently died as result of her injuries. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the family for $1.2 Million Dollars.

Contact Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Contact Information

Wall Huntington Law Firm
2024 North Woodlawn, Suite 406
Wichita, KS 67208
(800) 475-4140
(316) 665-7223
www.whtriallaw.com
MAP

The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers Million Dollar Adovocates Forum Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum AVVO Rating 10.0 superb